BLW Meals: Starting Solids vs Tim Hortons
BLW Meals: Starting Solids
BLW SOCIAL PTE. LTD.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 15K installs
VS
Tim Hortons
The TDL Group Corp.
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 9.7M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
Tim Hortons wins
+63702% vs other
MAU winner
Tim Hortons wins
+28557% vs other
Rating winner
BLW Meals: Starting Solids wins
+46% vs other
Why BLW Meals: Starting Solids is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Better app store reviews. BLW Meals: Starting Solids sits at 4.65★ vs 3.18★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BLW Meals: Starting Solids report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BLW Meals: Starting Solids
vs
Tim Hortons
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
15K
▶
9.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
2K
▶
516K
App Store rating
4.65★
◀
3.18★
Total ratings
305
▶
144K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 20, 2020
- Last updated
- Mar 24, 2026
- File size
- 14.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0.173
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 27, 2017
- Last updated
- Jun 3, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 7.1.552
- Languages
- -
BLW Meals: Starting Solids trajectory
Tim Hortons trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BLW Meals: Starting Solids or Tim Hortons? v
Tim Hortons earns about $0 per month, while BLW Meals: Starting Solids earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: BLW Meals: Starting Solids ≈ $0/year, Tim Hortons ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BLW Meals: Starting Solids or Tim Hortons? v
Tim Hortons leads with about 9.7M estimated downloads vs 15K for BLW Meals: Starting Solids - a 638.0× gap. BLW Meals: Starting Solids's App Store downloads are estimated from 305 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Tim Hortons reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BLW Meals: Starting Solids and Tim Hortons in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do BLW Meals: Starting Solids and Tim Hortons have in-app purchases? v
BLW Meals: Starting Solids does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Tim Hortons does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: BLW Meals: Starting Solids runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Tim Hortons runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, BLW Meals: Starting Solids or Tim Hortons? v
BLW Meals: Starting Solids edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.2 (gap of 1.5 stars). Rating volume: BLW Meals: Starting Solids 305 ratings, Tim Hortons 4K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BLW Meals: Starting Solids vs Tim Hortons revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for BLW Meals: Starting Solids and $0 for Tim Hortons are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BLW Meals: Starting Solids or Tim Hortons to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.