BOPKeeper vs QQ邮箱
BOPKeeper
Bervan Rusan
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2K installs
VS
QQ邮箱
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$2.9K/mo
~$35.0K/yr · 36K installs
Revenue winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+291500% vs other
Installs winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+2330% vs other
MAU winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+2245% vs other
Rating winner
QQ邮箱 wins
+356% vs other
Why QQ邮箱 is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- QQ邮箱 earns roughly 2915× more per month than BOPKeeper - $2.9K vs $0.
- Subscription model. QQ邮箱 runs a $8.99/mo subscription that compounds; BOPKeeper relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. QQ邮箱 has ~36K lifetime installs vs BOPKeeper's ~2K - 24.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. QQ邮箱 runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BOPKeeper
vs
QQ邮箱
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$2.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$35.0K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
▶
36K
Monthly active users (est.)?
427.5
▶
10K
App Store rating
-
▶
3.56★
Total ratings
0
▶
729
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$8.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
7 tiers
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 25, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- 2.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Productivity
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 24, 2011
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 173.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.1.6
- Languages
- English, Chinese, Chinese
BOPKeeper trajectory
QQ邮箱 trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BOPKeeper or QQ邮箱? v
QQ邮箱 earns about $2.9K per month, while BOPKeeper earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$2.9K more per month for QQ邮箱). Annual revenue: BOPKeeper ≈ $0/year, QQ邮箱 ≈ $35.0K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BOPKeeper or QQ邮箱? v
QQ邮箱 leads with about 36K estimated downloads vs 2K for BOPKeeper - a 24.3× gap. BOPKeeper's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. QQ邮箱's App Store downloads are estimated from 729 ratings.
Are BOPKeeper and QQ邮箱 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BOPKeeper and QQ邮箱 offer? v
BOPKeeper: no IAP detected on the public listing. QQ邮箱: IAP range 7 tiers detected. BOPKeeper runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; QQ邮箱 runs "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BOPKeeper or QQ邮箱? v
QQ邮箱 edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.6 stars). Rating volume: BOPKeeper 0 ratings, QQ邮箱 729 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BOPKeeper vs QQ邮箱 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for BOPKeeper and $2.9K for QQ邮箱 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BOPKeeper or QQ邮箱 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.