botim vs Threads
botim
Algento Cloud Computing Limited
App Store
$86.9K/mo
~$1.04M/yr · 5.7M installs
VS
Threads
Instagram, Inc.
App Store
$16.57M/mo
~$198.83M/yr · 327.8M installs
Revenue winner
Threads wins
+18976% vs other
Installs winner
Threads wins
+5643% vs other
MAU winner
Threads wins
+837% vs other
Rating winner
Threads wins
+7% vs other
Why Threads is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Threads earns roughly 191× more per month than botim - $16.57M vs $86.9K.
- Premium pricing. Threads charges $21.99/mo vs botim's $1.49/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Threads has ~327.8M lifetime installs vs botim's ~5.7M - 57.4× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Threads sits at 4.64★ vs 4.34★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Threads report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
botim
vs
Threads
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$86.9K
▶
$16.57M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.04M
▶
$198.83M
Lifetime installs (est.)
5.7M
▶
327.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
2.5M
▶
23.3M
App Store rating
4.34★
▶
4.64★
Total ratings
52K
▶
1.9M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$1.49
▶
$21.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
3 tiers
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 14, 2017
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- 461.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.9.1
- Languages
- Arabic, Catalan, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch +26 more
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 5, 2023
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 187.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 428.0
- Languages
- Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +25 more
botim trajectory
Threads trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, botim or Threads? v
Threads earns about $16.57M per month, while botim earns about $86.9K. That is a 190.8× revenue gap (~$16.48M more per month for Threads). Annual revenue: botim ≈ $1.04M/year, Threads ≈ $198.83M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, botim or Threads? v
Threads leads with about 327.8M estimated downloads vs 5.7M for botim - a 57.4× gap. botim's App Store downloads are estimated from 52K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Threads's App Store downloads are estimated from 1.9M ratings.
Are botim and Threads in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Social Networking category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do botim and Threads offer? v
botim: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Threads: IAP range 3 tiers detected. botim runs a "Subscription (~$1.08/mo)" monetization model; Threads runs "Subscription (~$21.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, botim or Threads? v
Threads edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: botim 52K ratings, Threads 1.9M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these botim vs Threads revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $86.9K for botim and $16.57M for Threads are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social Networking) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare botim or Threads to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.