Bourboneur vs Cotti Coffee AM
Bourboneur
Nicholas Owens
App Store
$39/mo
~$465/yr · 6K installs
VS
Cotti Coffee AM
Cotti Coffee International Limited
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner
Bourboneur wins
+3900% vs other
Installs winner
Bourboneur wins
+290% vs other
MAU winner
Bourboneur wins
+264% vs other
Rating winner
Cotti Coffee AM wins
+44% vs other
Why Bourboneur is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bourboneur earns roughly 39× more per month than Cotti Coffee AM - $39 vs $0.
- Subscription model. Bourboneur runs a $2.99/mo subscription that compounds; Cotti Coffee AM relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Bourboneur has ~6K lifetime installs vs Cotti Coffee AM's ~2K - 3.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Bourboneur report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Bourboneur
vs
Cotti Coffee AM
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$39
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$465
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
6K
◀
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
574.75
◀
158.1
App Store rating
1.97★
▶
2.84★
Total ratings
121
◀
31
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 22, 2024
- Last updated
- May 11, 2026
- File size
- 54.5 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 1.0.49
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 31, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- File size
- 67.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.5.2
- Languages
- English
Bourboneur trajectory
Cotti Coffee AM trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Bourboneur or Cotti Coffee AM? v
Bourboneur earns about $39 per month, while Cotti Coffee AM earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$39 more per month for Bourboneur). Annual revenue: Bourboneur ≈ $465/year, Cotti Coffee AM ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Bourboneur or Cotti Coffee AM? v
Bourboneur leads with about 6K estimated downloads vs 2K for Cotti Coffee AM - a 3.9× gap. Bourboneur's App Store downloads are estimated from 121 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Cotti Coffee AM's App Store downloads are estimated from 31 ratings.
Are Bourboneur and Cotti Coffee AM in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Bourboneur and Cotti Coffee AM offer? v
Bourboneur: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Cotti Coffee AM: no IAP detected on the public listing. Bourboneur runs a "Subscription (~$2.08/mo)" monetization model; Cotti Coffee AM runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Bourboneur or Cotti Coffee AM? v
Cotti Coffee AM edges ahead with ★ 2.8 vs ★ 2.0 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: Bourboneur 121 ratings, Cotti Coffee AM 31 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Bourboneur vs Cotti Coffee AM revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $39 for Bourboneur and $0 for Cotti Coffee AM are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Bourboneur or Cotti Coffee AM to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.