Braintoss vs QQ邮箱

Braintoss

Braintoss B.V.
App Store
$183/mo
~$2.2K/yr · 2K installs
VS

QQ邮箱

Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
$2.9K/mo
~$34.5K/yr · 36K installs
Revenue winner QQ邮箱 wins +1471% vs other
Installs winner QQ邮箱 wins +1461% vs other
MAU winner QQ邮箱 wins +1439% vs other
Rating winner Braintoss wins +5% vs other

Why QQ邮箱 is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. QQ邮箱 earns roughly 16× more per month than Braintoss - $2.9K vs $183.
  2. Subscription model. QQ邮箱 runs a $8.99/mo subscription that compounds; Braintoss relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. QQ邮箱 has ~36K lifetime installs vs Braintoss's ~2K - 15.6× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. QQ邮箱 runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full QQ邮箱 report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Braintoss
vs
QQ邮箱
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$183
$2.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.2K
$34.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
36K
Monthly active users (est.)?
644
10K
App Store rating
3.76★
3.58★
Total ratings
46
718
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$8.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
7 tiers

Braintoss

Braintoss B.V.
App Store
Category
Productivity
Price
USD2.99
Released
Jan 9, 2013
Last updated
May 6, 2026
File size
8.0 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
10.0
Languages
English
View full Braintoss report →

QQ邮箱

Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
App Store
Category
Productivity
Price
Free
Released
Oct 24, 2011
Last updated
May 6, 2026
File size
173.5 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
7.1.6
Languages
English, Chinese, Chinese
View full QQ邮箱 report →

Braintoss trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

QQ邮箱 trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Braintoss or QQ邮箱? v
QQ邮箱 earns about $2.9K per month, while Braintoss earns about $183. That is a 15.7× revenue gap (~$2.7K more per month for QQ邮箱). Annual revenue: Braintoss ≈ $2.2K/year, QQ邮箱 ≈ $34.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Braintoss or QQ邮箱? v
QQ邮箱 leads with about 36K estimated downloads vs 2K for Braintoss - a 15.6× gap. Braintoss's App Store downloads are estimated from 46 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. QQ邮箱's App Store downloads are estimated from 718 ratings.
Are Braintoss and QQ邮箱 in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Braintoss and QQ邮箱 offer? v
Braintoss: no IAP detected on the public listing. QQ邮箱: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Braintoss runs a "Paid app ($2.99)" monetization model; QQ邮箱 runs "Subscription (~$8.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Braintoss or QQ邮箱? v
Braintoss edges ahead with ★ 3.8 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Braintoss 46 ratings, QQ邮箱 718 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Braintoss vs QQ邮箱 revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $183 for Braintoss and $2.9K for QQ邮箱 are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Braintoss or QQ邮箱 to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.