Buffalo Wild Wings vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Buffalo Wild Wings
Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 95.2M installs
VS
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Fork Ranger
App Store
$57/mo
~$685/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+5700% vs other
Installs winner
Buffalo Wild Wings wins
+3225668% vs other
MAU winner
Buffalo Wild Wings wins
+1612784% vs other
Rating winner
Fork Ranger - sustainable food wins
+1% vs other
Why Fork Ranger - sustainable food is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns roughly 57× more per month than Buffalo Wild Wings - $57 vs $0.
- Subscription model. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs a $3.00/mo subscription that compounds; Buffalo Wild Wings relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fork Ranger - sustainable food report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Buffalo Wild Wings
vs
Fork Ranger - sustainable food
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$57
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$685
Lifetime installs (est.)
95.2M
◀
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
5.7M
◀
354
App Store rating
4.87★
▶
4.90★
Total ratings
634K
◀
59
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$3.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
4 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 13, 2015
- Last updated
- May 1, 2026
- File size
- 81.2 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 8.5.8
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2021
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- 34.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.3.1
- Languages
- Dutch, English, German
Buffalo Wild Wings trajectory
Fork Ranger - sustainable food trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Buffalo Wild Wings or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food earns about $57 per month, while Buffalo Wild Wings earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$57 more per month for Fork Ranger - sustainable food). Annual revenue: Buffalo Wild Wings ≈ $0/year, Fork Ranger - sustainable food ≈ $685/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Buffalo Wild Wings or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
Buffalo Wild Wings leads with about 95.2M estimated downloads vs 3K for Fork Ranger - sustainable food - a 32257.7× gap. Buffalo Wild Wings's App Store downloads are estimated from 634K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fork Ranger - sustainable food's App Store downloads are estimated from 59 ratings.
Are Buffalo Wild Wings and Fork Ranger - sustainable food in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Buffalo Wild Wings and Fork Ranger - sustainable food offer? v
Buffalo Wild Wings: no IAP detected on the public listing. Fork Ranger - sustainable food: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Buffalo Wild Wings runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Fork Ranger - sustainable food runs "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Buffalo Wild Wings or Fork Ranger - sustainable food? v
Fork Ranger - sustainable food edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.9 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Buffalo Wild Wings 634K ratings, Fork Ranger - sustainable food 59 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Buffalo Wild Wings vs Fork Ranger - sustainable food revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Buffalo Wild Wings and $57 for Fork Ranger - sustainable food are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Buffalo Wild Wings or Fork Ranger - sustainable food to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.