café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ）

SHIBATASHOTEN
App Store
$14/mo
~$174/yr · 400 installs
VS

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Too Good To Go
App Store
$5.73M/mo
~$68.75M/yr · 75.2M installs
Revenue winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +40924893% vs other
Installs winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +18807013% vs other
MAU winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +16959885% vs other
Rating winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +23% vs other

Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 409250× more per month than café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） - $5.73M vs $14.
  2. Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste charges $10.00/mo vs café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ）'s $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.2M lifetime installs vs café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ）'s ~400 - 188071.1× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste sits at 4.93★ vs 4.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ）
vs
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$14
▶
$5.73M
Annual revenue (est.)
$174
▶
$68.75M
Lifetime installs (est.)
400
▶
75.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
44.8
▶
7.6M
App Store rating
4.00★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
1
▶
502K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers

café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ）

SHIBATASHOTEN
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Oct 10, 2013
Last updated
Jan 22, 2026
File size
40.1 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
7.0.3
Languages
English
View full café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） report →

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Too Good To Go
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 8, 2015
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
141.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
26.5.0
Languages
EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
View full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report →

café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） App Store page →Too Good To Go: End Food Waste App Store page →

Related comparisons

Cafe Sweets iOS vs Fussy Toddler Recipes iOSCafe Sweets iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidCafe Sweets iOS vs Love Manuela iOSCafe Sweets iOS vs Doordash Food Grocery More iOS7 Eleven Rewards Shopping iOS vs Cafe Sweets iOSCafe Sweets iOS vs Mcdonald S iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $5.73M per month, while café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） earns about $14. That is a 409249.9× revenue gap (~$5.73M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） ≈ $174/year, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $68.75M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.2M estimated downloads vs 400 for café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） - a 188071.1× gap. café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ）'s App Store downloads are estimated from 1 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 502K ratings.
Are café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste offer? v
café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ）: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） 1 ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 502K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $14 for café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） and $5.73M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare café-sweets（カフェ・スイーツ） or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.