CAIXA vs Empiricus Research
CAIXA
Caixa Econômica Federal
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 181K installs
VS
Empiricus Research
Empiricus
App Store
$91/mo
~$1.1K/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner
Empiricus Research wins
+9100% vs other
Installs winner
CAIXA wins
+8125% vs other
MAU winner
CAIXA wins
+7781% vs other
Rating winner
Empiricus Research wins
+14% vs other
Why Empiricus Research is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Empiricus Research earns roughly 91× more per month than CAIXA - $91 vs $0.
- Subscription model. Empiricus Research runs a $2.99/mo subscription that compounds; CAIXA relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. Empiricus Research runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
- Better app store reviews. Empiricus Research sits at 4.77★ vs 4.20★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Empiricus Research report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$91
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$1.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
181K
◀
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
75K
◀
946
App Store rating
4.20★
▶
4.77★
Total ratings
2K
◀
44
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$2.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
7 tiers
- Category
- Finance
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 11, 2012
- Last updated
- Apr 29, 2026
- File size
- 170.3 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 5.24.1
- Languages
- Portuguese
- Category
- Finance
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 24, 2017
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 63.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.33.02
- Languages
- English
CAIXA trajectory
Empiricus Research trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, CAIXA or Empiricus Research? v
Empiricus Research earns about $91 per month, while CAIXA earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$91 more per month for Empiricus Research). Annual revenue: CAIXA ≈ $0/year, Empiricus Research ≈ $1.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CAIXA or Empiricus Research? v
CAIXA leads with about 181K estimated downloads vs 2K for Empiricus Research - a 82.3× gap. CAIXA's App Store downloads are estimated from 2K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Empiricus Research's App Store downloads are estimated from 44 ratings.
Are CAIXA and Empiricus Research in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Finance category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CAIXA and Empiricus Research offer? v
CAIXA: no IAP detected on the public listing. Empiricus Research: IAP range 7 tiers detected. CAIXA runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Empiricus Research runs "Subscription (~$2.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CAIXA or Empiricus Research? v
Empiricus Research edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.2 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: CAIXA 2K ratings, Empiricus Research 44 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CAIXA vs Empiricus Research revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for CAIXA and $91 for Empiricus Research are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Finance) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CAIXA or Empiricus Research to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
