Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Basic-Fit
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$3.95M/mo
~$47.44M/yr · 14.0M installs
VS
Basic-Fit
Basic-Fit
Google Play
$457.9K/mo
~$5.49M/yr · 5.9M installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+763% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+139% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+410% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+20% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 9× more per month than Basic-Fit - $3.95M vs $457.9K.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs Basic-Fit's $12.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.0M lifetime installs vs Basic-Fit's ~5.9M - 2.4× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Basic-Fit
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.95M
◀
$457.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$47.44M
◀
$5.49M
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.0M
◀
5.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
4.1M
◀
802K
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.00★
Total ratings
311K
◀
37K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$12.00
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 283.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.3.5
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 6, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.91.0
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
Basic-Fit trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Basic-Fit? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $3.95M per month, while Basic-Fit earns about $457.9K. That is a 8.6× revenue gap (~$3.50M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $47.44M/year, Basic-Fit ≈ $5.49M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Basic-Fit? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.0M estimated downloads vs 5.9M for Basic-Fit - a 2.4× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 311K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Basic-Fit reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Basic-Fit in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Basic-Fit offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Basic-Fit: no IAP detected on the public listing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Basic-Fit runs "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Basic-Fit? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.8 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 311K ratings, Basic-Fit 3 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Basic-Fit revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.95M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $457.9K for Basic-Fit are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Basic-Fit to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.