Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Fasting - Intermittent Fasting
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$3.95M/mo
~$47.44M/yr · 14.0M installs
VS
Fasting - Intermittent Fasting
Leap Fitness Group
Google Play
$2.78M/mo
~$33.39M/yr · 56.0M installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+42% vs other
Installs winner
Fasting - Intermittent Fasting wins
+300% vs other
MAU winner
Fasting - Intermittent Fasting wins
+19% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+0% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs Fasting - Intermittent Fasting's $8.90/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Fasting - Intermittent Fasting
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.95M
◀
$2.78M
Annual revenue (est.)
$47.44M
◀
$33.39M
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.0M
▶
56.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
4.1M
▶
4.9M
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.79★
Total ratings
311K
▶
967K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$8.90
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 283.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.3.5
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 25, 2019
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.4.7
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
Fasting - Intermittent Fasting trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Fasting - Intermittent Fasting? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $3.95M per month, while Fasting - Intermittent Fasting earns about $2.78M. That is a 1.4× revenue gap (~$1.17M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $47.44M/year, Fasting - Intermittent Fasting ≈ $33.39M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Fasting - Intermittent Fasting? v
Fasting - Intermittent Fasting leads with about 56.0M estimated downloads vs 14.0M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker - a 4.0× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 311K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fasting - Intermittent Fasting reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Fasting - Intermittent Fasting in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Fasting - Intermittent Fasting offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Fasting - Intermittent Fasting: IAP range $0.99 - $79.99 per item. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fasting - Intermittent Fasting runs "Subscription (~$8.90/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Fasting - Intermittent Fasting? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 311K ratings, Fasting - Intermittent Fasting 18K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Fasting - Intermittent Fasting revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.95M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $2.78M for Fasting - Intermittent Fasting are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Fasting - Intermittent Fasting to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.