Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit)
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$3.16M/mo
~$37.96M/yr · 14.9M installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google LLC
Google Play
$5.72M/mo
~$68.61M/yr · 266.7M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+81% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1686% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+177% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+26% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 2× more per month than Cal AI - Calorie Tracker - $5.72M vs $3.16M.
- Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $28.27/mo vs Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's $19.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~266.7M lifetime installs vs Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's ~14.9M - 17.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.16M
▶
$5.72M
Annual revenue (est.)
$37.96M
▶
$68.61M
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.9M
▶
266.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.3M
▶
9.1M
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
3.80★
Total ratings
332K
▶
1.3M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
▶
$28.27
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- File size
- 307.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.24.0
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 18, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.72M per month, while Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $3.16M. That is a 1.8× revenue gap (~$2.55M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $37.96M/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.61M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 266.7M estimated downloads vs 14.9M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker - a 17.9× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 332K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 332K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 250K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.16M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $5.72M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.