Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs GI and glycemic load
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$2.99M/mo
~$35.86M/yr · 14.1M installs
VS
GI and glycemic load
Sipione
Google Play
$46/mo
~$546/yr · 3K installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+6495604% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+553540% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+582819% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+480% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 64957× more per month than GI and glycemic load - $2.99M vs $46.
- Subscription model. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a $19.99/mo subscription that compounds; GI and glycemic load relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.1M lifetime installs vs GI and glycemic load's ~3K - 5536.4× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.99M
◀
$46
Annual revenue (est.)
$35.86M
◀
$546
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.1M
◀
3K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.1M
◀
529.776
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
-
Total ratings
313K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 283.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.3.5
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD1.49
- Released
- Sep 18, 2016
- Last updated
- Sep 30, 2024
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.0.10
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
GI and glycemic load trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or GI and glycemic load? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $2.99M per month, while GI and glycemic load earns about $46. That is a 64957.0× revenue gap (~$2.99M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $35.86M/year, GI and glycemic load ≈ $546/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or GI and glycemic load? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.1M estimated downloads vs 3K for GI and glycemic load - a 5536.4× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 313K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. GI and glycemic load reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and GI and glycemic load in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and GI and glycemic load offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. GI and glycemic load: no IAP detected on the public listing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; GI and glycemic load runs "Paid app ($1.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or GI and glycemic load? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 313K ratings, GI and glycemic load 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs GI and glycemic load revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.99M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $46 for GI and glycemic load are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or GI and glycemic load to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
