Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$2.99M/mo
~$35.86M/yr · 14.1M installs
VS
GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner
El CoCo
Google Play
$100.6K/mo
~$1.21M/yr · 590K installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+2870% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+2289% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+2357% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+8% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 30× more per month than GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner - $2.99M vs $100.6K.
- Aggressive pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker undercuts at $19.99/mo vs $29.98/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.1M lifetime installs vs GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner's ~590K - 23.9× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.99M
◀
$100.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$35.86M
◀
$1.21M
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.1M
◀
590K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.1M
◀
126K
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.43★
Total ratings
313K
◀
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
▶
$29.98
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 283.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.3.5
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 15, 2019
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.64.1
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $2.99M per month, while GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner earns about $100.6K. That is a 29.7× revenue gap (~$2.89M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $35.86M/year, GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner ≈ $1.21M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.1M estimated downloads vs 590K for GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner - a 23.9× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 313K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner runs "Subscription (~$29.98/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 313K ratings, GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner 362 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.99M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $100.6K for GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.