Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker

Viral Development LLC
App Store
$3.95M/mo
~$47.44M/yr · 14.0M installs
VS

Google Fit: Activity Tracking

Google LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 349.8M installs
Revenue winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +395330200% vs other
Installs winner Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins +2400% vs other
MAU winner Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins +183% vs other
Rating winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +37% vs other

Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 3953302× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracking - $3.95M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a $19.99/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
  4. Better app store reviews. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker sits at 4.80★ vs 3.51★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.95M
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$47.44M
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.0M
349.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
4.1M
11.5M
App Store rating
4.80★
3.51★
Total ratings
311K
679K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
No sub
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
0 tiers

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker

Viral Development LLC
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Apr 8, 2024
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
283.4 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.3.5
Languages
Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
View full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report →

Google Fit: Activity Tracking

Google LLC
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 28, 2014
Last updated
Apr 16, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Google Fit: Activity Tracking report →

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Google Fit: Activity Tracking trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $3.95M per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$3.95M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $47.44M/year, Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 349.8M estimated downloads vs 14.0M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker - a 25.0× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 311K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Google Fit: Activity Tracking in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Google Fit: Activity Tracking offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Google Fit: Activity Tracking: no IAP detected on the public listing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 311K ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking 29K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.95M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Fit: Activity Tracking to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.