Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$3.20M/mo
~$38.40M/yr · 15.1M installs
VS
Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente
Cotto al Dente
Google Play
$16.7K/mo
~$200.6K/yr · 160K installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+19042% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+9348% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+11145% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+480% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 191× more per month than Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente - $3.20M vs $16.7K.
- Aggressive pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker undercuts at $19.99/mo vs $22.49/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~15.1M lifetime installs vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente's ~160K - 94.5× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 3 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.20M
◀
$16.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$38.40M
◀
$200.6K
Lifetime installs (est.)
15.1M
◀
160K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.3M
◀
29K
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
-
Total ratings
336K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
▶
$22.49
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 306.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.25.0
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 24, 2020
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.2.1
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $3.20M per month, while Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente earns about $16.7K. That is a 191.4× revenue gap (~$3.18M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $38.40M/year, Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente ≈ $200.6K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 15.1M estimated downloads vs 160K for Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente - a 94.5× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 336K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente: IAP range $3.49 - $144.99 per item. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente runs "Subscription (~$22.49/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 336K ratings, Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.20M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $16.7K for Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.