Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker

Viral Development LLC
App Store
$2.99M/mo
~$35.86M/yr · 14.1M installs
VS

Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente

Cotto al Dente
Google Play
$16.6K/mo
~$199.3K/yr · 159K installs
Revenue winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +17888% vs other
Installs winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +8777% vs other
MAU winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +10466% vs other
Rating winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +480% vs other

Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 180× more per month than Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente - $2.99M vs $16.6K.
  2. Aggressive pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker undercuts at $19.99/mo vs $22.49/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  3. Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.1M lifetime installs vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente's ~159K - 88.8× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.99M
$16.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$35.86M
$199.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.1M
159K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.1M
29K
App Store rating
4.80★
-
Total ratings
313K
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
$22.49
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
0 tiers

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker

Viral Development LLC
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Apr 8, 2024
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
283.4 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.3.5
Languages
Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
View full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report →

Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente

Cotto al Dente
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jul 24, 2020
Last updated
Apr 30, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
4.2.1
Languages
-
View full Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente report →

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $2.99M per month, while Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente earns about $16.6K. That is a 179.9× revenue gap (~$2.97M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $35.86M/year, Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente ≈ $199.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.1M estimated downloads vs 159K for Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente - a 88.8× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 313K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente: IAP range $3.49 - $144.99 per item. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente runs "Subscription (~$22.49/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 313K ratings, Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.99M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $16.6K for Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Heat Fitness by Cotto al Dente to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.