Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker

Viral Development LLC
App Store
$2.99M/mo
~$35.86M/yr · 14.1M installs
VS

HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente

Cotto al Dente
App Store
$20/mo
~$238/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +14940020% vs other
Installs winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +3525200% vs other
MAU winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +2935416% vs other
Rating winner HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente wins +4% vs other

Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 149401× more per month than HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente - $2.99M vs $20.
  2. Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente's $17.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.1M lifetime installs vs HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente's ~400 - 35253.0× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.99M
$20
Annual revenue (est.)
$35.86M
$238
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.1M
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.1M
105.2
App Store rating
4.80★
5.00★
Total ratings
313K
4
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
$17.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
8 tiers

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker

Viral Development LLC
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Apr 8, 2024
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
283.4 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.3.5
Languages
Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
View full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report →

HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente

Cotto al Dente
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jun 11, 2020
Last updated
May 4, 2026
File size
134.8 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.2.1
Languages
English
View full HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente report →

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $2.99M per month, while HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente earns about $20. That is a 149401.2× revenue gap (~$2.99M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $35.86M/year, HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente ≈ $238/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.1M estimated downloads vs 400 for HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente - a 35253.0× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 313K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente's App Store downloads are estimated from 4 ratings.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente? v
HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente edges ahead with ★ 5.0 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 313K ratings, HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente 4 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.99M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $20 for HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or HEAT Fitness by Cotto al Dente to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.