Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$3.20M/mo
~$38.35M/yr · 15.1M installs
VS
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Ivy Apps Ltd
Google Play
$22.7K/mo
~$272.7K/yr · 209K installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+13967% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+7129% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+8188% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+6% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 141× more per month than Ivy: Processed Food Scanner - $3.20M vs $22.7K.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner's $17.30/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~15.1M lifetime installs vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner's ~209K - 72.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 3 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.20M
◀
$22.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$38.35M
◀
$272.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
15.1M
◀
209K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.3M
◀
40K
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.55★
Total ratings
335K
◀
11K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$17.30
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 306.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.25.0
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 10, 2025
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.3.9
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
Ivy: Processed Food Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $3.20M per month, while Ivy: Processed Food Scanner earns about $22.7K. That is a 140.7× revenue gap (~$3.17M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $38.35M/year, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner ≈ $272.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 15.1M estimated downloads vs 209K for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner - a 72.3× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 335K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Ivy: Processed Food Scanner in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Ivy: Processed Food Scanner offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Ivy: Processed Food Scanner: IAP range $5.99 - $49.99 per item. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Ivy: Processed Food Scanner runs "Subscription (~$17.30/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 335K ratings, Ivy: Processed Food Scanner 102 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Ivy: Processed Food Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.20M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $22.7K for Ivy: Processed Food Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Ivy: Processed Food Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.