Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$3.20M/mo
~$38.35M/yr · 15.1M installs
VS
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Giga Studios, Inc
App Store
$211.3K/mo
~$2.54M/yr · 4.3M installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+1413% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+250% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+195% vs other
Rating winner
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+0% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 15× more per month than Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner - $3.20M vs $211.3K.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner's $14.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~15.1M lifetime installs vs Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner's ~4.3M - 3.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.20M
◀
$211.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$38.35M
◀
$2.54M
Lifetime installs (est.)
15.1M
◀
4.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.3M
◀
1.1M
App Store rating
4.80★
▶
4.81★
Total ratings
335K
◀
39K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$14.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
▶
5 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 306.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.25.0
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 24, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 174.5 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 3.17.2
- Languages
- English
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $3.20M per month, while Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns about $211.3K. That is a 15.1× revenue gap (~$2.98M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $38.35M/year, Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner ≈ $2.54M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 15.1M estimated downloads vs 4.3M for Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner - a 3.5× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 335K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 39K ratings.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 335K ratings, Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner 39K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.20M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $211.3K for Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Olive: Food & Cosmetic Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.