Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$3.95M/mo
~$47.44M/yr · 14.0M installs
VS
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
AIBY
App Store
$646.3K/mo
~$7.76M/yr · 3.6M installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+512% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+291% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+342% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+2% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 6× more per month than OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner - $3.95M vs $646.3K.
- Aggressive pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker undercuts at $19.99/mo vs $21.68/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.0M lifetime installs vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner's ~3.6M - 3.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.95M
◀
$646.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$47.44M
◀
$7.76M
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.0M
◀
3.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
4.1M
◀
924K
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.69★
Total ratings
311K
◀
33K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
▶
$21.68
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
▶
8 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 283.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.3.5
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 14, 2022
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- 113.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.1
- Languages
- Arabic, English, Portuguese, Spanish
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $3.95M per month, while OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner earns about $646.3K. That is a 6.1× revenue gap (~$3.31M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $47.44M/year, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner ≈ $7.76M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.0M estimated downloads vs 3.6M for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner - a 3.9× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 311K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 33K ratings.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner runs "Subscription (~$21.68/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 311K ratings, OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner 33K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.95M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $646.3K for OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or OnSkin: Beauty Product Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.