Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs PosturePing

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker

Viral Development LLC
App Store
$2.99M/mo
~$35.86M/yr · 14.1M installs
VS

PosturePing

Niels-Benjamin Schnadt
App Store
$36/mo
~$426/yr · 2K installs
Revenue winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +8299967% vs other
Installs winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +939980% vs other
MAU winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +840216% vs other
Rating winner Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins +480% vs other

Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 83001× more per month than PosturePing - $2.99M vs $36.
  2. Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs PosturePing's $2.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.1M lifetime installs vs PosturePing's ~2K - 9400.8× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
PosturePing
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.99M
$36
Annual revenue (est.)
$35.86M
$426
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.1M
2K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.1M
367.5
App Store rating
4.80★
-
Total ratings
313K
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
$2.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
1 tiers

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker

Viral Development LLC
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Apr 8, 2024
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
283.4 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.3.5
Languages
Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
View full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report →

PosturePing

Niels-Benjamin Schnadt
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
May 7, 2026
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
17.4 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.0
Languages
English
View full PosturePing report →

Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

PosturePing trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or PosturePing? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $2.99M per month, while PosturePing earns about $36. That is a 83000.7× revenue gap (~$2.99M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $35.86M/year, PosturePing ≈ $426/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or PosturePing? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.1M estimated downloads vs 2K for PosturePing - a 9400.8× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 313K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PosturePing's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and PosturePing in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and PosturePing offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. PosturePing: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; PosturePing runs "Subscription (~$2.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or PosturePing? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 313K ratings, PosturePing 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs PosturePing revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.99M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $36 for PosturePing are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or PosturePing to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.