Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs PSL - Looksmax & Ascend
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$2.99M/mo
~$35.86M/yr · 14.1M installs
VS
PSL - Looksmax & Ascend
IQ Labs LLC
Google Play
$45.7K/mo
~$547.9K/yr · 418K installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+6444% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+3272% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+3746% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+5% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 65× more per month than PSL - Looksmax & Ascend - $2.99M vs $45.7K.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs PSL - Looksmax & Ascend's $14.13/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.1M lifetime installs vs PSL - Looksmax & Ascend's ~418K - 33.7× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 3 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
PSL - Looksmax & Ascend
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.99M
◀
$45.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$35.86M
◀
$547.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.1M
◀
418K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.1M
◀
80K
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.59★
Total ratings
313K
◀
20K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$14.13
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 283.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.3.5
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 30, 2025
- Last updated
- Jan 29, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.1.5
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
PSL - Looksmax & Ascend trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or PSL - Looksmax & Ascend? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $2.99M per month, while PSL - Looksmax & Ascend earns about $45.7K. That is a 65.4× revenue gap (~$2.94M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $35.86M/year, PSL - Looksmax & Ascend ≈ $547.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or PSL - Looksmax & Ascend? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.1M estimated downloads vs 418K for PSL - Looksmax & Ascend - a 33.7× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 313K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. PSL - Looksmax & Ascend reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and PSL - Looksmax & Ascend in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and PSL - Looksmax & Ascend offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. PSL - Looksmax & Ascend: IAP range $4.99 - $39.99 per item. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; PSL - Looksmax & Ascend runs "Subscription (~$14.13/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or PSL - Looksmax & Ascend? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 313K ratings, PSL - Looksmax & Ascend 72 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs PSL - Looksmax & Ascend revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.99M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $45.7K for PSL - Looksmax & Ascend are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or PSL - Looksmax & Ascend to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.