Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$2.96M/mo
~$35.58M/yr · 14.0M installs
VS
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Liviet
Google Play
$31.2K/mo
~$374.9K/yr · 285K installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+9391% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+4813% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+5475% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+3% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 95× more per month than SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker - $2.96M vs $31.2K.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's $6.47/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.0M lifetime installs vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's ~285K - 49.1× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.96M
◀
$31.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$35.58M
◀
$374.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.0M
◀
285K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.1M
◀
55K
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.65★
Total ratings
311K
◀
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$6.47
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 283.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.3.5
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 12, 2019
- Last updated
- May 9, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Mature 17+
- Version
- 2.315
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $2.96M per month, while SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker earns about $31.2K. That is a 94.9× revenue gap (~$2.93M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $35.58M/year, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker ≈ $374.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.0M estimated downloads vs 285K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker - a 49.1× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 311K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker: IAP range $3.49 - $11.99 per item. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker runs "Subscription (~$6.47/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 311K ratings, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.96M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $31.2K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.