Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Six Pack in 30 Days
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$2.96M/mo
~$35.58M/yr · 14.0M installs
VS
Six Pack in 30 Days
Leap Fitness Group
Google Play
$5.63M/mo
~$67.52M/yr · 209.0M installs
Revenue winner
Six Pack in 30 Days wins
+90% vs other
Installs winner
Six Pack in 30 Days wins
+1394% vs other
MAU winner
Six Pack in 30 Days wins
+180% vs other
Rating winner
Six Pack in 30 Days wins
+3% vs other
Why Six Pack in 30 Days is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Six Pack in 30 Days earns roughly 2× more per month than Cal AI - Calorie Tracker - $5.63M vs $2.96M.
- Aggressive pricing. Six Pack in 30 Days undercuts at $19.98/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Six Pack in 30 Days has ~209.0M lifetime installs vs Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's ~14.0M - 14.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Six Pack in 30 Days report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Six Pack in 30 Days
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.96M
▶
$5.63M
Annual revenue (est.)
$35.58M
▶
$67.52M
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.0M
▶
209.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.1M
▶
8.6M
App Store rating
4.80★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
311K
▶
2.8M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$19.98
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 283.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.3.5
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 9, 2018
- Last updated
- Mar 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.4.5
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
Six Pack in 30 Days trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Six Pack in 30 Days? v
Six Pack in 30 Days earns about $5.63M per month, while Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $2.96M. That is a 1.9× revenue gap (~$2.66M more per month for Six Pack in 30 Days). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $35.58M/year, Six Pack in 30 Days ≈ $67.52M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Six Pack in 30 Days? v
Six Pack in 30 Days leads with about 209.0M estimated downloads vs 14.0M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker - a 14.9× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 311K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Six Pack in 30 Days reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Six Pack in 30 Days in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Six Pack in 30 Days offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Six Pack in 30 Days: IAP range $4.99 - $79.99 per item. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Six Pack in 30 Days runs "Subscription (~$19.98/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Six Pack in 30 Days? v
Six Pack in 30 Days edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 311K ratings, Six Pack in 30 Days 57K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Six Pack in 30 Days revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.96M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $5.63M for Six Pack in 30 Days are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Six Pack in 30 Days to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.