Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Staffordshire Walks
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$3.20M/mo
~$38.35M/yr · 15.1M installs
VS
Staffordshire Walks
TinyRocket
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+319605700% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+1508485500% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+330358325% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+480% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 3196057× more per month than Staffordshire Walks - $3.20M vs $0.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs Staffordshire Walks's $2.49/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~15.1M lifetime installs vs Staffordshire Walks's ~0 - 15084855.0× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 3 IAP tiers vs 2 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Staffordshire Walks
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.20M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$38.35M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
15.1M
◀
0
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.3M
◀
0
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
-
Total ratings
335K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$2.49
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 306.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.25.0
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 28, 2021
- Last updated
- Feb 28, 2025
- File size
- 79.3 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.1
- Languages
- English
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
Staffordshire Walks trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Staffordshire Walks? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $3.20M per month, while Staffordshire Walks earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$3.20M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $38.35M/year, Staffordshire Walks ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Staffordshire Walks? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 15.1M estimated downloads vs 0 for Staffordshire Walks - a ∞× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 335K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Staffordshire Walks's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Staffordshire Walks in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Staffordshire Walks offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Staffordshire Walks: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Staffordshire Walks runs "Subscription (~$1.46/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Staffordshire Walks? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 335K ratings, Staffordshire Walks 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Staffordshire Walks revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.20M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $0 for Staffordshire Walks are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Staffordshire Walks to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.