Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$2.99M/mo
~$35.86M/yr · 14.1M installs
VS
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
Zwift, Inc
App Store
$390.3K/mo
~$4.68M/yr · 2.3M installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+665% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+503% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+412% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+1% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 8× more per month than Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness - $2.99M vs $390.3K.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker has ~14.1M lifetime installs vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness's ~2.3M - 6.0× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.99M
◀
$390.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$35.86M
◀
$4.68M
Lifetime installs (est.)
14.1M
◀
2.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.1M
◀
603K
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.74★
Total ratings
313K
◀
21K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
=
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 283.4 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 3.3.5
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 10, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
- File size
- 3.52 GB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.112.0
- Languages
- English
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $2.99M per month, while Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness earns about $390.3K. That is a 7.7× revenue gap (~$2.60M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $35.86M/year, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness ≈ $4.68M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker leads with about 14.1M estimated downloads vs 2.3M for Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness - a 6.0× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 313K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 21K ratings.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness runs "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 313K ratings, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness 21K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.99M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $390.3K for Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.