Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit)
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Improvement Tech LLC
Google Play
$430.5K/mo
~$5.17M/yr · 4.1M installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google LLC
Google Play
$5.72M/mo
~$68.61M/yr · 266.7M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1228% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+6349% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1423% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+22% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 13× more per month than Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker - $5.72M vs $430.5K.
- Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $28.27/mo vs Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker's $24.48/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~266.7M lifetime installs vs Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker's ~4.1M - 64.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$430.5K
▶
$5.72M
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.17M
▶
$68.61M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.1M
▶
266.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
595K
▶
9.1M
App Store rating
4.62★
◀
3.80★
Total ratings
271K
▶
1.3M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$24.48
▶
$28.27
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 29, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 12, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 26.24.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 18, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.72M per month, while Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns about $430.5K. That is a 13.3× revenue gap (~$5.29M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $5.17M/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.61M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 266.7M estimated downloads vs 4.1M for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker - a 64.5× gap. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $59.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$24.48/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.8 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker 2K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 250K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $430.5K for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and $5.72M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.