Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker vs FitFast - Intermittent Fasting
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Improvement Tech LLC
Google Play
$416.2K/mo
~$4.99M/yr · 4.0M installs
VS
FitFast - Intermittent Fasting
VALSELA LTD
Google Play
$17.6K/mo
~$211.2K/yr · 127K installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+2264% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+3038% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+2266% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+3% vs other
Why Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns roughly 24× more per month than FitFast - Intermittent Fasting - $416.2K vs $17.6K.
- Aggressive pricing. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker undercuts at $24.48/mo vs $36.93/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker has ~4.0M lifetime installs vs FitFast - Intermittent Fasting's ~127K - 31.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
vs
FitFast - Intermittent Fasting
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$416.2K
◀
$17.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.99M
◀
$211.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.0M
◀
127K
Monthly active users (est.)?
575K
◀
24K
App Store rating
4.64★
◀
4.51★
Total ratings
264K
◀
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$24.48
▶
$36.93
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 29, 2024
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.231
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 9, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.31.7
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
FitFast - Intermittent Fasting trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or FitFast - Intermittent Fasting? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns about $416.2K per month, while FitFast - Intermittent Fasting earns about $17.6K. That is a 23.6× revenue gap (~$398.6K more per month for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $4.99M/year, FitFast - Intermittent Fasting ≈ $211.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or FitFast - Intermittent Fasting? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 4.0M estimated downloads vs 127K for FitFast - Intermittent Fasting - a 31.4× gap. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. FitFast - Intermittent Fasting reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and FitFast - Intermittent Fasting in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and FitFast - Intermittent Fasting offer? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $59.99 per item. FitFast - Intermittent Fasting: IAP range $20.99 - $64.99 per item. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$24.48/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; FitFast - Intermittent Fasting runs "Subscription (~$36.93/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or FitFast - Intermittent Fasting? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker 2K ratings, FitFast - Intermittent Fasting 7 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker vs FitFast - Intermittent Fasting revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $416.2K for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and $17.6K for FitFast - Intermittent Fasting are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or FitFast - Intermittent Fasting to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.