Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker vs Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Improvement Tech LLC
Google Play
$415.8K/mo
~$4.99M/yr · 4.0M installs
VS
Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker
Lyfta Gym Workout Tracker
Google Play
$242.2K/mo
~$2.91M/yr · 3.3M installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+72% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+22% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+35% vs other
Rating winner
Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker wins
+4% vs other
Why Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns roughly 2× more per month than Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker - $415.8K vs $242.2K.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker charges $24.48/mo vs Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker's $20.00/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$415.8K
◀
$242.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.99M
◀
$2.91M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.0M
◀
3.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
574K
◀
425K
App Store rating
4.65★
▶
4.82★
Total ratings
264K
◀
55K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$24.48
◀
$20.00
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 29, 2024
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.231
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 30, 2022
- Last updated
- May 3, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns about $415.8K per month, while Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker earns about $242.2K. That is a 1.7× revenue gap (~$173.6K more per month for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $4.99M/year, Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker ≈ $2.91M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 4.0M estimated downloads vs 3.3M for Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker - a 1.2× gap. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker offer? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $59.99 per item. Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker: IAP range $5.00 - $79.99 per item. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$24.48/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker runs "Subscription (~$20.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker? v
Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker 2K ratings, Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker 252 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker vs Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $415.8K for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and $242.2K for Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or Lyfta: Gym Log Workout Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.