Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
Improvement Tech LLC
Google Play
$415.8K/mo
~$4.99M/yr · 4.0M installs
VS
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Liviet
Google Play
$31.2K/mo
~$374.5K/yr · 285K installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+1232% vs other
Installs winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+1301% vs other
MAU winner
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker wins
+945% vs other
Rating winner
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker wins
+0% vs other
Why Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns roughly 13× more per month than SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker - $415.8K vs $31.2K.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker charges $24.48/mo vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's $6.47/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker has ~4.0M lifetime installs vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker's ~285K - 14.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker
vs
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$415.8K
◀
$31.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$4.99M
◀
$374.5K
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.0M
◀
285K
Monthly active users (est.)?
574K
◀
55K
App Store rating
4.64★
▶
4.65★
Total ratings
264K
◀
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$24.48
◀
$6.47
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 29, 2024
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.231
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 12, 2019
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Mature 17+
- Version
- 2.315
- Languages
- -
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker earns about $415.8K per month, while SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker earns about $31.2K. That is a 13.3× revenue gap (~$384.6K more per month for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $4.99M/year, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker ≈ $374.5K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker leads with about 4.0M estimated downloads vs 285K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker - a 14.0× gap. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker offer? v
Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $59.99 per item. SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker: IAP range $3.49 - $11.99 per item. Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$24.48/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker runs "Subscription (~$6.47/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker? v
SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker 2K ratings, SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker vs SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $415.8K for Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker and $31.2K for SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Food Calorie Tracker or SimFast: Fasting Timer Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.