Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit)
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
Viral Development LLC
App Store
$4.17M/mo
~$50.06M/yr · 15.1M installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.56M/mo
~$18.67M/yr · 101.6M installs
Revenue winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+168% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+573% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+118% vs other
Rating winner
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker wins
+7% vs other
Why Cal AI - Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns roughly 3× more per month than Google Health (Fitbit) - $4.17M vs $1.56M.
- Premium pricing. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker charges $12.00/mo vs Google Health (Fitbit)'s $9.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Better app store reviews. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker sits at 4.80★ vs 4.49★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cal AI - Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$4.17M
◀
$1.56M
Annual revenue (est.)
$50.06M
◀
$18.67M
Lifetime installs (est.)
15.1M
▶
101.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.3M
▶
7.2M
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.49★
Total ratings
335K
▶
677K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$12.00
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 8, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 306.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.25.0
- Languages
- Arabic, AZ, Dutch, English, French, German +9 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker earns about $4.17M per month, while Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.56M. That is a 2.7× revenue gap (~$2.62M more per month for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker ≈ $50.06M/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $18.67M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.6M estimated downloads vs 15.1M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker - a 6.7× gap. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 335K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings.
Are Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. Cal AI - Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$12.00/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Cal AI - Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Cal AI - Calorie Tracker 335K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cal AI - Calorie Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $4.17M for Cal AI - Calorie Tracker and $1.56M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cal AI - Calorie Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.