Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter vs Google Health (Fitbit)
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Next Vision Limited
App Store
$175.6K/mo
~$2.11M/yr · 626K installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.36M/mo
~$16.32M/yr · 101.5M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+675% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+16111% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+3883% vs other
Rating winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+5% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 8× more per month than Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter - $1.36M vs $175.6K.
- Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.5M lifetime installs vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter's ~626K - 162.1× the funnel top.
- Charts placement. Google Health (Fitbit) ranks #94 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$175.6K
▶
$1.36M
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.11M
▶
$16.32M
Lifetime installs (est.)
626K
▶
101.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
181K
▶
7.2M
App Store rating
4.70★
◀
4.49★
Total ratings
18K
▶
677K
US grossing rank
-
▶
#94
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
2 tiers
=
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 11, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- File size
- 220.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.68
- Languages
- Arabic, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +14 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.36M per month, while Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter earns about $175.6K. That is a 7.7× revenue gap (~$1.18M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter ≈ $2.11M/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $16.32M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.5M estimated downloads vs 626K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter - a 162.1× gap. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 18K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings.
Are Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$19.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #94". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter 18K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $175.6K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter and $1.36M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.