Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit)
Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker
Gymwork Inc.
App Store
$118/mo
~$1.4K/yr · 845 installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.55M/mo
~$18.61M/yr · 101.2M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1313855% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+11973983% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+2951844% vs other
Rating winner
Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker wins
+3% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 13140× more per month than Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker - $1.55M vs $118.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.2M lifetime installs vs Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker's ~845 - 119740.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$118
▶
$1.55M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.4K
▶
$18.61M
Lifetime installs (est.)
845
▶
101.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
243.36
▶
7.2M
App Store rating
4.62★
◀
4.49★
Total ratings
26
▶
675K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
=
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
▶
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 20, 2026
- Last updated
- Jun 22, 2026
- File size
- 104.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0.89
- Languages
- Czech, English, French, German, Japanese, Korean +2 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.55M per month, while Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker earns about $118. That is a 13139.6× revenue gap (~$1.55M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker ≈ $1.4K/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $18.61M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.2M estimated downloads vs 845 for Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker - a 119740.8× gap. Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 26 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 675K ratings.
Are Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker 26 ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 675K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $118 for Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker and $1.55M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calog - Calorie Macro Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.