Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías vs Google Health (Fitbit)
Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías
Emilio Rodriguez
App Store
$156/mo
~$1.9K/yr · 4K installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.56M/mo
~$18.69M/yr · 101.6M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+998031% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+2743301% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+746189% vs other
Rating winner
Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías wins
+8% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 9981× more per month than Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías - $1.56M vs $156.
- Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $9.99/mo vs Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías's $4.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.6M lifetime installs vs Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías's ~4K - 27434.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$156
▶
$1.56M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.9K
▶
$18.69M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4K
▶
101.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
967.005
▶
7.2M
App Store rating
4.87★
◀
4.49★
Total ratings
57
▶
678K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
▶
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 25, 2026
- Last updated
- May 21, 2026
- File size
- 76.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.0.55
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.56M per month, while Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías earns about $156. That is a 9981.3× revenue gap (~$1.56M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías ≈ $1.9K/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $18.69M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.6M estimated downloads vs 4K for Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías - a 27434.0× gap. Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías's App Store downloads are estimated from 53 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 678K ratings.
Are Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías runs a "Subscription (~$4.99/mo)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías 53 ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 678K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $156 for Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías and $1.56M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calor.IA: Contador de Calorías or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
