Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter
Virtuagym
Google Play
$828.8K/mo
~$9.95M/yr · 8.8M installs
VS
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Yazio
Google Play
$4.68M/mo
~$56.20M/yr · 55.7M installs
Revenue winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+465% vs other
Installs winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+533% vs other
MAU winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+279% vs other
Rating winner
Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter wins
+1% vs other
Why Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 6× more per month than Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter - $4.68M vs $828.8K.
- Premium pricing. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker charges $45.79/mo vs Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter's $20.48/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker has ~55.7M lifetime installs vs Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter's ~8.8M - 6.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter
vs
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$828.8K
▶
$4.68M
Annual revenue (est.)
$9.95M
▶
$56.20M
Lifetime installs (est.)
8.8M
▶
55.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.2M
▶
4.7M
App Store rating
4.47★
◀
4.41★
Total ratings
93K
▶
805K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$20.48
▶
$45.79
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 17, 2014
- Last updated
- Apr 21, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.0.8
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 23, 2014
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 12.83.1
- Languages
- -
Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter trajectory
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $4.68M per month, while Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter earns about $828.8K. That is a 5.7× revenue gap (~$3.85M more per month for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter ≈ $9.95M/year, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $56.20M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker leads with about 55.7M estimated downloads vs 8.8M for Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter - a 6.3× gap. Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter: IAP range $6.99 - $59.99 per item. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $299.99 per item. Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter runs a "Subscription (~$20.48/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$45.79/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter 3K ratings, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $828.8K for Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter and $4.68M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie, Carb & Fat Counter or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.