Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Calz: Calorie Counter AI
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
fatsecret
Google Play
$4.32M/mo
~$51.84M/yr · 62.8M installs
VS
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
Wachanga
Google Play
$263.4K/mo
~$3.16M/yr · 3.2M installs
Revenue winner
Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins
+1540% vs other
Installs winner
Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins
+1875% vs other
MAU winner
Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins
+1080% vs other
Rating winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+2% vs other
Why Calorie Counter by fatsecret is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calorie Counter by fatsecret earns roughly 16× more per month than Calz: Calorie Counter AI - $4.32M vs $263.4K.
- Premium pricing. Calorie Counter by fatsecret charges $29.99/mo vs Calz: Calorie Counter AI's $15.45/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Calorie Counter by fatsecret has ~62.8M lifetime installs vs Calz: Calorie Counter AI's ~3.2M - 19.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calorie Counter by fatsecret report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
vs
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$4.32M
◀
$263.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$51.84M
◀
$3.16M
Lifetime installs (est.)
62.8M
◀
3.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
5.4M
◀
458K
App Store rating
4.55★
▶
4.64★
Total ratings
539K
◀
133K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$29.99
◀
$15.45
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 11.4.0.5
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 7, 2025
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.42.0
- Languages
- -
Calorie Counter by fatsecret trajectory
Calz: Calorie Counter AI trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Calz: Calorie Counter AI? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret earns about $4.32M per month, while Calz: Calorie Counter AI earns about $263.4K. That is a 16.4× revenue gap (~$4.06M more per month for Calorie Counter by fatsecret). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter by fatsecret ≈ $51.84M/year, Calz: Calorie Counter AI ≈ $3.16M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Calz: Calorie Counter AI? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret leads with about 62.8M estimated downloads vs 3.2M for Calz: Calorie Counter AI - a 19.8× gap. Calorie Counter by fatsecret reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Calz: Calorie Counter AI reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Calz: Calorie Counter AI in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Calz: Calorie Counter AI offer? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret: IAP range $14.99 - $59.99 per item. Calz: Calorie Counter AI: IAP range $1.99 - $119.99 per item. Calorie Counter by fatsecret runs a "Subscription (~$29.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Calz: Calorie Counter AI runs "Subscription (~$15.45/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Calz: Calorie Counter AI? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter by fatsecret 25K ratings, Calz: Calorie Counter AI 239 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Calz: Calorie Counter AI revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $4.32M for Calorie Counter by fatsecret and $263.4K for Calz: Calorie Counter AI are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Calz: Calorie Counter AI to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.