Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Google Health (Fitbit)

Calorie Counter by fatsecret

fatsecret
Google Play
$4.32M/mo
~$51.84M/yr · 62.8M installs
VS

Google Health (Fitbit)

Google LLC
Google Play
$5.72M/mo
~$68.61M/yr · 266.7M installs
Revenue winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +32% vs other
Installs winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +324% vs other
MAU winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +68% vs other
Rating winner Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins +20% vs other

Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $28.27/mo vs $29.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  2. Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~266.7M lifetime installs vs Calorie Counter by fatsecret's ~62.8M - 4.2× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Calorie Counter by fatsecret
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$4.32M
$5.72M
Annual revenue (est.)
$51.84M
$68.61M
Lifetime installs (est.)
62.8M
266.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
5.4M
9.1M
App Store rating
4.54★
3.80★
Total ratings
541K
1.3M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$29.99
$28.27
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Calorie Counter by fatsecret

fatsecret
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
May 27, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
11.5.0.4
Languages
-
View full Calorie Counter by fatsecret report →

Google Health (Fitbit)

Google LLC
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Mar 16, 2012
Last updated
Jun 18, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Google Health (Fitbit) report →

Calorie Counter by fatsecret trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

FAQ

Which makes more money, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.72M per month, while Calorie Counter by fatsecret earns about $4.32M. That is a 1.3× revenue gap (~$1.40M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter by fatsecret ≈ $51.84M/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.61M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 266.7M estimated downloads vs 62.8M for Calorie Counter by fatsecret - a 4.2× gap. Calorie Counter by fatsecret reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret: IAP range $14.99 - $59.99 per item. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Calorie Counter by fatsecret runs a "Subscription (~$29.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.7 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter by fatsecret 25K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 250K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $4.32M for Calorie Counter by fatsecret and $5.72M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.