Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker

Calorie Counter by fatsecret

fatsecret
Google Play
$4.32M/mo
~$51.84M/yr · 62.8M installs
VS

Nutrition & Calorie Tracker

PLHGlobal
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 256K installs
Revenue winner Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins +431967000% vs other
Installs winner Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins +24442% vs other
MAU winner Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins +12030% vs other
Rating winner Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins +38% vs other

Why Calorie Counter by fatsecret is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Calorie Counter by fatsecret earns roughly 4319670× more per month than Nutrition & Calorie Tracker - $4.32M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Calorie Counter by fatsecret runs a $29.99/mo subscription that compounds; Nutrition & Calorie Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Calorie Counter by fatsecret has ~62.8M lifetime installs vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker's ~256K - 245.4× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Calorie Counter by fatsecret sits at 4.54★ vs 3.29★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calorie Counter by fatsecret report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Calorie Counter by fatsecret
vs
Nutrition & Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$4.32M
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$51.84M
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
62.8M
256K
Monthly active users (est.)?
5.4M
45K
App Store rating
4.54★
3.29★
Total ratings
539K
465
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$29.99
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Calorie Counter by fatsecret

fatsecret
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
11.4.0.5
Languages
-
View full Calorie Counter by fatsecret report →

Nutrition & Calorie Tracker

PLHGlobal
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Feb 9, 2026
Last updated
Apr 1, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.0.2
Languages
-
View full Nutrition & Calorie Tracker report →

Calorie Counter by fatsecret trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Nutrition & Calorie Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret earns about $4.32M per month, while Nutrition & Calorie Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$4.32M more per month for Calorie Counter by fatsecret). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter by fatsecret ≈ $51.84M/year, Nutrition & Calorie Tracker ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret leads with about 62.8M estimated downloads vs 256K for Nutrition & Calorie Tracker - a 245.4× gap. Calorie Counter by fatsecret reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Nutrition & Calorie Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Nutrition & Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Nutrition & Calorie Tracker offer? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret: IAP range $14.99 - $59.99 per item. Nutrition & Calorie Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Calorie Counter by fatsecret runs a "Subscription (~$29.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Nutrition & Calorie Tracker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.3 (gap of 1.3 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter by fatsecret 25K ratings, Nutrition & Calorie Tracker 3 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Nutrition & Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $4.32M for Calorie Counter by fatsecret and $0 for Nutrition & Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Nutrition & Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.