Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Google Health (Fitbit)
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
fatsecret
App Store
$74.4K/mo
~$892.7K/yr · 503K installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.43M/mo
~$17.12M/yr · 101.5M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+1818% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+20073% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+4822% vs other
Rating winner
Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins
+6% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 19× more per month than Calorie Counter by fatsecret - $1.43M vs $74.4K.
- Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $10.49/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.5M lifetime installs vs Calorie Counter by fatsecret's ~503K - 201.7× the funnel top.
- Charts placement. Google Health (Fitbit) ranks #91 on the US grossing chart (the other app is unranked) - chart placement is a self-reinforcing flywheel.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$74.4K
▶
$1.43M
Annual revenue (est.)
$892.7K
▶
$17.12M
Lifetime installs (est.)
503K
▶
101.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
146K
▶
7.2M
App Store rating
4.76★
◀
4.49★
Total ratings
14K
▶
677K
US grossing rank
-
▶
#91
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.49
◀
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 23, 2009
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- 143.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 11.6
- Languages
- Arabic, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +17 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
Calorie Counter by fatsecret trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.43M per month, while Calorie Counter by fatsecret earns about $74.4K. That is a 19.2× revenue gap (~$1.35M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter by fatsecret ≈ $892.7K/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $17.12M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.5M estimated downloads vs 503K for Calorie Counter by fatsecret - a 201.7× gap. Calorie Counter by fatsecret's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings.
Are Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. Calorie Counter by fatsecret runs a "Subscription (~$10.49/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #91". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter by fatsecret 14K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $74.4K for Calorie Counter by fatsecret and $1.43M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.