Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Health Sense: Track & Record
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
fatsecret
App Store
$74.5K/mo
~$894.1K/yr · 504K installs
VS
Health Sense: Track & Record
Health Applines
Google Play
$700.2K/mo
~$8.40M/yr · 17.3M installs
Revenue winner
Health Sense: Track & Record wins
+840% vs other
Installs winner
Health Sense: Track & Record wins
+3324% vs other
MAU winner
Health Sense: Track & Record wins
+735% vs other
Rating winner
Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins
+32% vs other
Why Health Sense: Track & Record is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Health Sense: Track & Record earns roughly 9× more per month than Calorie Counter by fatsecret - $700.2K vs $74.5K.
- Premium pricing. Health Sense: Track & Record charges $10.93/mo vs Calorie Counter by fatsecret's $10.49/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Health Sense: Track & Record has ~17.3M lifetime installs vs Calorie Counter by fatsecret's ~504K - 34.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Health Sense: Track & Record report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
vs
Health Sense: Track & Record
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$74.5K
▶
$700.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$894.1K
▶
$8.40M
Lifetime installs (est.)
504K
▶
17.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
147K
▶
1.2M
App Store rating
4.76★
◀
3.60★
Total ratings
14K
◀
9K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.49
▶
$10.93
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 23, 2009
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- 143.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 11.6
- Languages
- Arabic, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +17 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 16, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 10, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.25.0
- Languages
- -
Calorie Counter by fatsecret trajectory
Health Sense: Track & Record trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Health Sense: Track & Record? v
Health Sense: Track & Record earns about $700.2K per month, while Calorie Counter by fatsecret earns about $74.5K. That is a 9.4× revenue gap (~$625.7K more per month for Health Sense: Track & Record). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter by fatsecret ≈ $894.1K/year, Health Sense: Track & Record ≈ $8.40M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Health Sense: Track & Record? v
Health Sense: Track & Record leads with about 17.3M estimated downloads vs 504K for Calorie Counter by fatsecret - a 34.2× gap. Calorie Counter by fatsecret's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Health Sense: Track & Record reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Health Sense: Track & Record in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Health Sense: Track & Record offer? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Health Sense: Track & Record: IAP range $2.99 - $39.99 per item. Calorie Counter by fatsecret runs a "Subscription (~$10.49/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Health Sense: Track & Record runs "Subscription (~$10.93/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Health Sense: Track & Record? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter by fatsecret 14K ratings, Health Sense: Track & Record 880 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Health Sense: Track & Record revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $74.5K for Calorie Counter by fatsecret and $700.2K for Health Sense: Track & Record are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Health Sense: Track & Record to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.