Calorie Counter by Lose It! vs FitFast - Intermittent Fasting
Calorie Counter by Lose It!
FitNow, Inc.
Google Play
$1.39M/mo
~$16.72M/yr · 21.2M installs
VS
FitFast - Intermittent Fasting
VALSELA LTD
Google Play
$17.6K/mo
~$210.8K/yr · 127K installs
Revenue winner
Calorie Counter by Lose It! wins
+7834% vs other
Installs winner
Calorie Counter by Lose It! wins
+16598% vs other
MAU winner
Calorie Counter by Lose It! wins
+7418% vs other
Rating winner
Calorie Counter by Lose It! wins
+1% vs other
Why Calorie Counter by Lose It! is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calorie Counter by Lose It! earns roughly 79× more per month than FitFast - Intermittent Fasting - $1.39M vs $17.6K.
- Aggressive pricing. Calorie Counter by Lose It! undercuts at $27.33/mo vs $36.93/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Calorie Counter by Lose It! has ~21.2M lifetime installs vs FitFast - Intermittent Fasting's ~127K - 167.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calorie Counter by Lose It! report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie Counter by Lose It!
vs
FitFast - Intermittent Fasting
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.39M
◀
$17.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$16.72M
◀
$210.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
21.2M
◀
127K
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.8M
◀
24K
App Store rating
4.57★
◀
4.51★
Total ratings
177K
◀
2K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$27.33
▶
$36.93
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 24, 2011
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 18.2.700
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 9, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.31.7
- Languages
- -
Calorie Counter by Lose It! trajectory
FitFast - Intermittent Fasting trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie Counter by Lose It! or FitFast - Intermittent Fasting? v
Calorie Counter by Lose It! earns about $1.39M per month, while FitFast - Intermittent Fasting earns about $17.6K. That is a 79.3× revenue gap (~$1.38M more per month for Calorie Counter by Lose It!). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter by Lose It! ≈ $16.72M/year, FitFast - Intermittent Fasting ≈ $210.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter by Lose It! or FitFast - Intermittent Fasting? v
Calorie Counter by Lose It! leads with about 21.2M estimated downloads vs 127K for FitFast - Intermittent Fasting - a 167.0× gap. Calorie Counter by Lose It! reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play. FitFast - Intermittent Fasting reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calorie Counter by Lose It! and FitFast - Intermittent Fasting in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter by Lose It! and FitFast - Intermittent Fasting offer? v
Calorie Counter by Lose It!: IAP range $2.49 - $299.99 per item. FitFast - Intermittent Fasting: IAP range $20.99 - $64.99 per item. Calorie Counter by Lose It! runs a "Subscription (~$27.33/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; FitFast - Intermittent Fasting runs "Subscription (~$36.93/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter by Lose It! or FitFast - Intermittent Fasting? v
Calorie Counter by Lose It! edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter by Lose It! 44K ratings, FitFast - Intermittent Fasting 7 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter by Lose It! vs FitFast - Intermittent Fasting revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.39M for Calorie Counter by Lose It! and $17.6K for FitFast - Intermittent Fasting are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter by Lose It! or FitFast - Intermittent Fasting to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.