Calorie Counter & Food Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit)

Calorie Counter & Food Tracker

Municorn Limited
App Store
$86.8K/mo
~$1.04M/yr · 1.0M installs
VS

Google Health (Fitbit)

Google
App Store
$1.56M/mo
~$18.68M/yr · 101.6M installs
Revenue winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +1694% vs other
Installs winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +9744% vs other
MAU winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +2310% vs other
Rating winner Calorie Counter & Food Tracker wins +5% vs other

Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 18× more per month than Calorie Counter & Food Tracker - $1.56M vs $86.8K.
  2. Aggressive pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) undercuts at $9.99/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  3. Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.6M lifetime installs vs Calorie Counter & Food Tracker's ~1.0M - 98.4× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Calorie Counter & Food Tracker
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$86.8K
$1.56M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.04M
$18.68M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.0M
101.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
299K
7.2M
App Store rating
4.71★
4.49★
Total ratings
29K
677K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
2 tiers

Calorie Counter & Food Tracker

Municorn Limited
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jan 31, 2024
Last updated
Jul 2, 2026
File size
230.4 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
1.11
Languages
Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, NB +5 more
View full Calorie Counter & Food Tracker report →

Google Health (Fitbit)

Google
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 18, 2011
Last updated
Jun 23, 2026
File size
548.8 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
5.02.1
Languages
Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
View full Google Health (Fitbit) report →

Calorie Counter & Food Tracker trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.56M per month, while Calorie Counter & Food Tracker earns about $86.8K. That is a 17.9× revenue gap (~$1.47M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter & Food Tracker ≈ $1.04M/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $18.68M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.6M estimated downloads vs 1.0M for Calorie Counter & Food Tracker - a 98.4× gap. Calorie Counter & Food Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 29K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings.
Are Calorie Counter & Food Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter & Food Tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. Calorie Counter & Food Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter & Food Tracker 29K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter & Food Tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $86.8K for Calorie Counter & Food Tracker and $1.56M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.