Calorie Counter + vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Calorie Counter +

NutraTech Ltd
App Store
$165.1K/mo
~$1.98M/yr · 2.8M installs
VS

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
$2.71M/mo
~$32.47M/yr · 98.7M installs
Revenue winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +1539% vs other
Installs winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +3397% vs other
MAU winner Fitbit: Health & Fitness wins +1615% vs other
Rating winner Calorie Counter + wins +5% vs other

Why Fitbit: Health & Fitness is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns roughly 16× more per month than Calorie Counter + - $2.71M vs $165.1K.
  2. Premium pricing. Fitbit: Health & Fitness charges $9.99/mo vs Calorie Counter +'s $6.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Fitbit: Health & Fitness has ~98.7M lifetime installs vs Calorie Counter +'s ~2.8M - 35.0× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Calorie Counter +
vs
Fitbit: Health & Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$165.1K
$2.71M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.98M
$32.47M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
98.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
731K
12.5M
App Store rating
4.77★
4.53★
Total ratings
26K
658K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
2 tiers

Calorie Counter +

NutraTech Ltd
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Sep 24, 2014
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
115.5 MB
Content rating
17+
Version
12.11.0
Languages
English, Spanish
View full Calorie Counter + report →

Fitbit: Health & Fitness

Google
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Oct 18, 2011
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
450.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
4.69
Languages
Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, ET, Finnish +22 more
View full Fitbit: Health & Fitness report →

Calorie Counter + trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Fitbit: Health & Fitness trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Calorie Counter + or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness earns about $2.71M per month, while Calorie Counter + earns about $165.1K. That is a 16.4× revenue gap (~$2.54M more per month for Fitbit: Health & Fitness). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter + ≈ $1.98M/year, Fitbit: Health & Fitness ≈ $32.47M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter + or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Fitbit: Health & Fitness leads with about 98.7M estimated downloads vs 2.8M for Calorie Counter + - a 35.0× gap. Calorie Counter +'s App Store downloads are estimated from 26K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitbit: Health & Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 658K ratings.
Are Calorie Counter + and Fitbit: Health & Fitness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter + and Fitbit: Health & Fitness offer? v
Calorie Counter +: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Fitbit: Health & Fitness: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Calorie Counter + runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Fitbit: Health & Fitness runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter + or Fitbit: Health & Fitness? v
Calorie Counter + edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter + 26K ratings, Fitbit: Health & Fitness 658K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter + vs Fitbit: Health & Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $165.1K for Calorie Counter + and $2.71M for Fitbit: Health & Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter + or Fitbit: Health & Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.