Calorie counter - Scanfood vs essen & trinken Magazin
Calorie counter - Scanfood
Have a nice day
App Store
$156/mo
~$1.9K/yr · 6K installs
VS
essen & trinken Magazin
Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH
App Store
$27/mo
~$322/yr · 400 installs
Revenue winner
Calorie counter - Scanfood wins
+478% vs other
Installs winner
Calorie counter - Scanfood wins
+1438% vs other
MAU winner
Calorie counter - Scanfood wins
+1556% vs other
Rating winner
Calorie counter - Scanfood wins
+32% vs other
Why Calorie counter - Scanfood is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calorie counter - Scanfood earns roughly 6× more per month than essen & trinken Magazin - $156 vs $27.
- Aggressive pricing. Calorie counter - Scanfood undercuts at $6.99/mo vs $19.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Calorie counter - Scanfood has ~6K lifetime installs vs essen & trinken Magazin's ~400 - 15.4× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Calorie counter - Scanfood sits at 3.97★ vs 3.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calorie counter - Scanfood report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie counter - Scanfood
vs
essen & trinken Magazin
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$156
◀
$27
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.9K
◀
$322
Lifetime installs (est.)
6K
◀
400
Monthly active users (est.)?
688.8
◀
41.6
App Store rating
3.97★
◀
3.00★
Total ratings
123
◀
3
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
=
10 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 7, 2020
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 54.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.14
- Languages
- Arabic, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French +15 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 4, 2016
- Last updated
- Jul 14, 2025
- File size
- 163.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.2.0
- Languages
- Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian +3 more
Calorie counter - Scanfood trajectory
essen & trinken Magazin trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie counter - Scanfood or essen & trinken Magazin? v
Calorie counter - Scanfood earns about $156 per month, while essen & trinken Magazin earns about $27. That is a 5.8× revenue gap (~$129 more per month for Calorie counter - Scanfood). Annual revenue: Calorie counter - Scanfood ≈ $1.9K/year, essen & trinken Magazin ≈ $322/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie counter - Scanfood or essen & trinken Magazin? v
Calorie counter - Scanfood leads with about 6K estimated downloads vs 400 for essen & trinken Magazin - a 15.4× gap. Calorie counter - Scanfood's App Store downloads are estimated from 123 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. essen & trinken Magazin's App Store downloads are estimated from 3 ratings.
Are Calorie counter - Scanfood and essen & trinken Magazin in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie counter - Scanfood and essen & trinken Magazin offer? v
Calorie counter - Scanfood: IAP range 10 tiers detected. essen & trinken Magazin: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Calorie counter - Scanfood runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; essen & trinken Magazin runs "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie counter - Scanfood or essen & trinken Magazin? v
Calorie counter - Scanfood edges ahead with ★ 4.0 vs ★ 3.0 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Calorie counter - Scanfood 123 ratings, essen & trinken Magazin 3 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie counter - Scanfood vs essen & trinken Magazin revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $156 for Calorie counter - Scanfood and $27 for essen & trinken Magazin are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie counter - Scanfood or essen & trinken Magazin to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.