Calorie counter - Scanfood vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner
Calorie counter - Scanfood
Have a nice day
App Store
$156/mo
~$1.9K/yr · 6K installs
VS
Samsung Food: Meal Planner
Whisk food
App Store
$13.4K/mo
~$160.9K/yr · 499K installs
Revenue winner
Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins
+8493% vs other
Installs winner
Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins
+8020% vs other
MAU winner
Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins
+8527% vs other
Rating winner
Samsung Food: Meal Planner wins
+21% vs other
Why Samsung Food: Meal Planner is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Samsung Food: Meal Planner earns roughly 86× more per month than Calorie counter - Scanfood - $13.4K vs $156.
- Bigger install base. Samsung Food: Meal Planner has ~499K lifetime installs vs Calorie counter - Scanfood's ~6K - 81.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Samsung Food: Meal Planner sits at 4.78★ vs 3.97★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Samsung Food: Meal Planner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$156
▶
$13.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.9K
▶
$160.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
6K
▶
499K
Monthly active users (est.)?
688.8
▶
59K
App Store rating
3.97★
▶
4.78★
Total ratings
123
▶
6K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
=
$6.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 7, 2020
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 54.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.14
- Languages
- Arabic, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French +15 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 15, 2016
- Last updated
- May 11, 2026
- File size
- 164.5 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 5.56.0
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Korean, Portuguese +1 more
Calorie counter - Scanfood trajectory
Samsung Food: Meal Planner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie counter - Scanfood or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Samsung Food: Meal Planner earns about $13.4K per month, while Calorie counter - Scanfood earns about $156. That is a 85.9× revenue gap (~$13.2K more per month for Samsung Food: Meal Planner). Annual revenue: Calorie counter - Scanfood ≈ $1.9K/year, Samsung Food: Meal Planner ≈ $160.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie counter - Scanfood or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Samsung Food: Meal Planner leads with about 499K estimated downloads vs 6K for Calorie counter - Scanfood - a 81.2× gap. Calorie counter - Scanfood's App Store downloads are estimated from 123 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Samsung Food: Meal Planner's App Store downloads are estimated from 6K ratings.
Are Calorie counter - Scanfood and Samsung Food: Meal Planner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie counter - Scanfood and Samsung Food: Meal Planner offer? v
Calorie counter - Scanfood: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Samsung Food: Meal Planner: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Calorie counter - Scanfood runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Samsung Food: Meal Planner runs "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie counter - Scanfood or Samsung Food: Meal Planner? v
Samsung Food: Meal Planner edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.8 stars). Rating volume: Calorie counter - Scanfood 123 ratings, Samsung Food: Meal Planner 6K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie counter - Scanfood vs Samsung Food: Meal Planner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $156 for Calorie counter - Scanfood and $13.4K for Samsung Food: Meal Planner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie counter - Scanfood or Samsung Food: Meal Planner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
