Calorie counter - Scanfood vs TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs
Calorie counter - Scanfood
Have a nice day
App Store
$154/mo
~$1.8K/yr · 6K installs
VS
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs
Treat App
App Store
$967.6K/mo
~$11.61M/yr · 5.2M installs
Revenue winner
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins
+628218% vs other
Installs winner
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins
+86453% vs other
MAU winner
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins
+92635% vs other
Rating winner
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins
+22% vs other
Why TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs earns roughly 6283× more per month than Calorie counter - Scanfood - $967.6K vs $154.
- Premium pricing. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs charges $47.75/mo vs Calorie counter - Scanfood's $6.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs has ~5.2M lifetime installs vs Calorie counter - Scanfood's ~6K - 865.5× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs sits at 4.89★ vs 4.02★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie counter - Scanfood
vs
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$154
▶
$967.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.8K
▶
$11.61M
Lifetime installs (est.)
6K
▶
5.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
677.6
▶
628K
App Store rating
4.02★
▶
4.89★
Total ratings
121
▶
48K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
▶
$47.75
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
=
10 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 7, 2020
- Last updated
- Apr 18, 2026
- File size
- 54.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.11
- Languages
- Arabic, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French +15 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 15, 2022
- Last updated
- Apr 12, 2026
- File size
- 267.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 20.6.1
- Languages
- English, Russian
Calorie counter - Scanfood trajectory
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie counter - Scanfood or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs earns about $967.6K per month, while Calorie counter - Scanfood earns about $154. That is a 6283.2× revenue gap (~$967.5K more per month for TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs). Annual revenue: Calorie counter - Scanfood ≈ $1.8K/year, TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs ≈ $11.61M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie counter - Scanfood or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs leads with about 5.2M estimated downloads vs 6K for Calorie counter - Scanfood - a 865.5× gap. Calorie counter - Scanfood's App Store downloads are estimated from 121 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs's App Store downloads are estimated from 48K ratings.
Are Calorie counter - Scanfood and TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie counter - Scanfood and TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs offer? v
Calorie counter - Scanfood: IAP range 10 tiers detected. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Calorie counter - Scanfood runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs runs "Subscription (~$47.75/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie counter - Scanfood or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: Calorie counter - Scanfood 121 ratings, TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs 48K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie counter - Scanfood vs TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $154 for Calorie counter - Scanfood and $967.6K for TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie counter - Scanfood or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.