Calorie counter - Scanfood vs Uber Eats: Food and Grocery

Calorie counter - Scanfood

Have a nice day
App Store
$154/mo
~$1.8K/yr · 6K installs
VS

Uber Eats: Food and Grocery

Uber Technologies, Inc.
Google Play
$975.2K/mo
~$11.70M/yr · 286.8M installs
Revenue winner Uber Eats: Food and Grocery wins +633149% vs other
Installs winner Uber Eats: Food and Grocery wins +4739655% vs other
MAU winner Uber Eats: Food and Grocery wins +677008% vs other
Rating winner Uber Eats: Food and Grocery wins +15% vs other

Why Uber Eats: Food and Grocery is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Uber Eats: Food and Grocery earns roughly 6332× more per month than Calorie counter - Scanfood - $975.2K vs $154.
  2. Premium pricing. Uber Eats: Food and Grocery charges $9.99/mo vs Calorie counter - Scanfood's $6.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Uber Eats: Food and Grocery has ~286.8M lifetime installs vs Calorie counter - Scanfood's ~6K - 47397.5× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Uber Eats: Food and Grocery sits at 4.63★ vs 4.02★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Uber Eats: Food and Grocery report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Calorie counter - Scanfood
vs
Uber Eats: Food and Grocery
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$154
▶
$975.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.8K
▶
$11.70M
Lifetime installs (est.)
6K
▶
286.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
677.6
▶
4.6M
App Store rating
4.02★
▶
4.63★
Total ratings
121
▶
7.5M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
10 tiers
◀
0 tiers

Calorie counter - Scanfood

Have a nice day
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Feb 7, 2020
Last updated
May 12, 2026
File size
54.2 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
2.12
Languages
Arabic, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, French +15 more
View full Calorie counter - Scanfood report →

Uber Eats: Food and Grocery

Uber Technologies, Inc.
Google Play
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Feb 29, 2016
Last updated
May 12, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
6.322.10003
Languages
-
View full Uber Eats: Food and Grocery report →

Calorie counter - Scanfood trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Uber Eats: Food and Grocery trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Calorie counter - Scanfood App Store page →Uber Eats: Food and Grocery Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Calorie Counter Scanfood iOS vs Fussy Toddler Recipes iOSCalorie Counter Scanfood iOS vs Sidekick by Sorted Food iOSCalorie Counter Scanfood iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidCalorie Counter Scanfood iOS vs Love Manuela iOSCalorie Counter Scanfood iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSCalorie Counter Scanfood iOS vs Doordash Food Grocery More iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Calorie counter - Scanfood or Uber Eats: Food and Grocery? v
Uber Eats: Food and Grocery earns about $975.2K per month, while Calorie counter - Scanfood earns about $154. That is a 6332.5× revenue gap (~$975.0K more per month for Uber Eats: Food and Grocery). Annual revenue: Calorie counter - Scanfood ≈ $1.8K/year, Uber Eats: Food and Grocery ≈ $11.70M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie counter - Scanfood or Uber Eats: Food and Grocery? v
Uber Eats: Food and Grocery leads with about 286.8M estimated downloads vs 6K for Calorie counter - Scanfood - a 47397.5× gap. Calorie counter - Scanfood's App Store downloads are estimated from 121 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Uber Eats: Food and Grocery reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calorie counter - Scanfood and Uber Eats: Food and Grocery in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie counter - Scanfood and Uber Eats: Food and Grocery offer? v
Calorie counter - Scanfood: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Uber Eats: Food and Grocery: no IAP detected on the public listing. Calorie counter - Scanfood runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Uber Eats: Food and Grocery runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie counter - Scanfood or Uber Eats: Food and Grocery? v
Uber Eats: Food and Grocery edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Calorie counter - Scanfood 121 ratings, Uber Eats: Food and Grocery 376K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie counter - Scanfood vs Uber Eats: Food and Grocery revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $154 for Calorie counter - Scanfood and $975.2K for Uber Eats: Food and Grocery are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie counter - Scanfood or Uber Eats: Food and Grocery to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.