CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter vs Google Health (Fitbit)
CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter
CaloSyncAi.com
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 0 installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google
App Store
$1.56M/mo
~$18.67M/yr · 101.6M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+155587700% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+10155945000% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+721072095% vs other
Rating winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+449% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 1555877× more per month than CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter - $1.56M vs $0.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~101.6M lifetime installs vs CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter's ~0 - 101559450.0× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Google Health (Fitbit) sits at 4.49★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$1.56M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$18.67M
Lifetime installs (est.)
0
▶
101.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
0
▶
7.2M
App Store rating
-
▶
4.49★
Total ratings
0
▶
677K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
=
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
2 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 12, 2025
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 92.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.2
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 18, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 23, 2026
- File size
- 548.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.02.1
- Languages
- Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +26 more
CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $1.56M per month, while CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$1.56M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter ≈ $0/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $18.67M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 101.6M estimated downloads vs 0 for CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter - a ∞× gap. CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 0 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit)'s App Store downloads are estimated from 677K ratings.
Are CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range 2 tiers detected. CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$6.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.5 stars). Rating volume: CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter 0 ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 677K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter and $1.56M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare CaloSync AI - Calorie Counter or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.