Calz: Calorie Counter AI vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
Wachanga
Google Play
$263.4K/mo
~$3.16M/yr · 3.2M installs
VS
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Cronometer Software Inc.
Google Play
$464.6K/mo
~$5.58M/yr · 5.4M installs
Revenue winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+76% vs other
Installs winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+71% vs other
MAU winner
Cronometer: Calorie Counter wins
+71% vs other
Rating winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+0% vs other
Why Cronometer: Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns roughly 2× more per month than Calz: Calorie Counter AI - $464.6K vs $263.4K.
- Premium pricing. Cronometer: Calorie Counter charges $16.40/mo vs Calz: Calorie Counter AI's $15.45/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Cronometer: Calorie Counter has ~5.4M lifetime installs vs Calz: Calorie Counter AI's ~3.2M - 1.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Cronometer: Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
vs
Cronometer: Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$263.4K
▶
$464.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.16M
▶
$5.58M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.2M
▶
5.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
458K
▶
785K
App Store rating
4.64★
◀
4.63★
Total ratings
133K
◀
53K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$15.45
▶
$16.40
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 7, 2025
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.42.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 13, 2016
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Calz: Calorie Counter AI trajectory
Cronometer: Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter earns about $464.6K per month, while Calz: Calorie Counter AI earns about $263.4K. That is a 1.8× revenue gap (~$201.2K more per month for Cronometer: Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Calz: Calorie Counter AI ≈ $3.16M/year, Cronometer: Calorie Counter ≈ $5.58M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Cronometer: Calorie Counter leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 3.2M for Calz: Calorie Counter AI - a 1.7× gap. Calz: Calorie Counter AI reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Cronometer: Calorie Counter reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calz: Calorie Counter AI and Cronometer: Calorie Counter in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calz: Calorie Counter AI and Cronometer: Calorie Counter offer? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI: IAP range $1.99 - $119.99 per item. Cronometer: Calorie Counter: IAP range $2.99 - $89.99 per item. Calz: Calorie Counter AI runs a "Subscription (~$15.45/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Cronometer: Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$16.40/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or Cronometer: Calorie Counter? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Calz: Calorie Counter AI 240 ratings, Cronometer: Calorie Counter 8K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calz: Calorie Counter AI vs Cronometer: Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $263.4K for Calz: Calorie Counter AI and $464.6K for Cronometer: Calorie Counter are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calz: Calorie Counter AI or Cronometer: Calorie Counter to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.