Calz: Calorie Counter AI vs GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
Wachanga
Google Play
$263.4K/mo
~$3.16M/yr · 3.2M installs
VS
GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner
El CoCo
Google Play
$100.7K/mo
~$1.21M/yr · 590K installs
Revenue winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+162% vs other
Installs winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+439% vs other
MAU winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+264% vs other
Rating winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+4% vs other
Why Calz: Calorie Counter AI is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calz: Calorie Counter AI earns roughly 3× more per month than GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner - $263.4K vs $100.7K.
- Aggressive pricing. Calz: Calorie Counter AI undercuts at $15.45/mo vs $29.98/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Calz: Calorie Counter AI has ~3.2M lifetime installs vs GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner's ~590K - 5.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calz: Calorie Counter AI report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
vs
GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$263.4K
◀
$100.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.16M
◀
$1.21M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.2M
◀
590K
Monthly active users (est.)?
458K
◀
126K
App Store rating
4.64★
◀
4.44★
Total ratings
133K
◀
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$15.45
▶
$29.98
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 7, 2025
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.42.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 15, 2019
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.64.1
- Languages
- -
Calz: Calorie Counter AI trajectory
GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI earns about $263.4K per month, while GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner earns about $100.7K. That is a 2.6× revenue gap (~$162.7K more per month for Calz: Calorie Counter AI). Annual revenue: Calz: Calorie Counter AI ≈ $3.16M/year, GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner ≈ $1.21M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI leads with about 3.2M estimated downloads vs 590K for GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner - a 5.4× gap. Calz: Calorie Counter AI reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calz: Calorie Counter AI and GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calz: Calorie Counter AI and GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner offer? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI: IAP range $1.99 - $119.99 per item. GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Calz: Calorie Counter AI runs a "Subscription (~$15.45/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner runs "Subscription (~$29.98/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Calz: Calorie Counter AI 240 ratings, GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner 364 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calz: Calorie Counter AI vs GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $263.4K for Calz: Calorie Counter AI and $100.7K for GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calz: Calorie Counter AI or GoCoCo: Diabetes Food Scanner to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.