Calz: Calorie Counter AI vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
Wachanga
Google Play
$263.4K/mo
~$3.16M/yr · 3.2M installs
VS
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
Google Play
$95.2K/mo
~$1.14M/yr · 1.3M installs
Revenue winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+177% vs other
Installs winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+145% vs other
MAU winner
Calz: Calorie Counter AI wins
+173% vs other
Rating winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+1% vs other
Why Calz: Calorie Counter AI is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calz: Calorie Counter AI earns roughly 3× more per month than MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - $263.4K vs $95.2K.
- Premium pricing. Calz: Calorie Counter AI charges $15.45/mo vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's $11.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Calz: Calorie Counter AI has ~3.2M lifetime installs vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's ~1.3M - 2.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calz: Calorie Counter AI report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
vs
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$263.4K
◀
$95.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.16M
◀
$1.14M
Lifetime installs (est.)
3.2M
◀
1.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
458K
◀
168K
App Store rating
4.64★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
133K
◀
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$15.45
◀
$11.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 7, 2025
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.42.0
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 14, 2021
- Last updated
- Mar 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone 10+
- Version
- 5.7.6
- Languages
- -
Calz: Calorie Counter AI trajectory
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI earns about $263.4K per month, while MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $95.2K. That is a 2.8× revenue gap (~$168.2K more per month for Calz: Calorie Counter AI). Annual revenue: Calz: Calorie Counter AI ≈ $3.16M/year, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $1.14M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI leads with about 3.2M estimated downloads vs 1.3M for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - a 2.4× gap. Calz: Calorie Counter AI reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calz: Calorie Counter AI and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calz: Calorie Counter AI and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker offer? v
Calz: Calorie Counter AI: IAP range $1.99 - $119.99 per item. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range $9.99 - $89.99 per item. Calz: Calorie Counter AI runs a "Subscription (~$15.45/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calz: Calorie Counter AI or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Calz: Calorie Counter AI 239 ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calz: Calorie Counter AI vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $263.4K for Calz: Calorie Counter AI and $95.2K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calz: Calorie Counter AI or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.